Prostate Cancer Survivors

 

YANA - YOU ARE NOT ALONE NOW

PROSTATE CANCER SUPPORT SITE

 

 

This forum is for the discussion of anything to do with Prostate Cancer.
There are only four rules:

  • No fundraisers, no commercials (although it is OK to recommend choices of treatment or medical people based on your personal research; invitations to participate in third-party surveys are also acceptable, provided there is no compensation to YANA);
  • No harvesting e-mail addresses for Spam;
  • No insults or flaming - be polite and respectful at all times and understand that there may be a variety of points of view, all of which may have some validity;
  • Opinions are OK, but please provide as much factual evidence as possible for any assertions that you are making

Failure to abide by these simple rules will result in the immediate and permanent suspension of your posting privileges.

Since this is an International Forum, please specify your location in your post.

General Forum
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: One year on Active Surveillance so far.......

the 2nd (and 3rd!) opinion was told to me last night over the phone by my URO. the hospital pathologist was wrong!!! my Gleason remains a 3+3!!!!!!

the expert pathologist came to that conclusion, and the 3rd opinion was from a pathologist at John's Hopkins! (I did not even know they were sending it for a 3rd opinion there! but am am pleased!).

so, after a year, I punched back! I'm winning so far. Not going to get cocky. just going to keep up the hard work with exercise and healthy eating.

Re: One year on Active Surveillance so far.......

forgot to add (verified today with visit to my treating URO), that the 2 positive cores were 10% and less that 5%!!!!

I am ecstatic. :)

RETURN TO HOME PAGE LINKS