This forum is for the discussion of anything to do with Prostate Cancer. There are only four rules:
No fundraisers, no commercials (although it is OK to recommend choices of treatment or medical people based on your personal research; invitations to participate in third-party surveys are also acceptable, provided there is no compensation to YANA);
No harvesting e-mail addresses for Spam;
No insults or flaming - be polite and respectful at all times and understand that there may be a variety of points of view, all of which may have some validity;
Opinions are OK, but please provide as much factual evidence as possible for any assertions that you are making
Failure to abide by these simple rules will result in the immediate and permanent suspension of your posting privileges.
Since this is an International Forum, please specify your location in your post.
Martin; First, death from cancer of any kind is rarely pleasant and should be avoided if practical. I am in about the same situation as you, just ten years younger. My number at last test was slightly elevated over the past twelve years results. Yes, it is concerning. Radiation is an option IF they find exactly where it is and if it is localized. The other more likely path will be some form of hormone treatment to slow the growth, if they think it needs treatment at all right now. Many factors enter into the equation and that is why you are correct to see your urologist. Keep us informed of what you discover and best wishes. Jon.