This forum is for the discussion of anything to do with Prostate Cancer. There are only four rules:
No fundraisers, no commercials (although it is OK to recommend choices of treatment or medical people based on your personal research; invitations to participate in third-party surveys are also acceptable, provided there is no compensation to YANA);
No harvesting e-mail addresses for Spam;
No insults or flaming - be polite and respectful at all times and understand that there may be a variety of points of view, all of which may have some validity;
Opinions are OK, but please provide as much factual evidence as possible for any assertions that you are making
Failure to abide by these simple rules will result in the immediate and permanent suspension of your posting privileges.
Since this is an International Forum, please specify your location in your post.
I had a further review with my Oncologist today and my PSA is up again to 0.50 (from 0.43 one month ago - not 0.47 as stated in my original post). So it seems to be increasing currently at a rate of +/-0.07 per month.
My Oncologist is a "Consultant Clinical Oncologist" (and a Prof. to boot!!) so I am not sure if this answers your question re "Medical" versus "Radiation"? I'm not sure the two specialisms are split here in the UK as they appear to be in the US. Perhaps someone other UK-based forumite will be able to clarify?
I asked at today's phone consult if there are any clues (from the rate and pattern of PSA progression) as to the likely whereabouts of any cancer activity (i.e. prostate bed or micromets) but I was told that this cannot be determined from blood tests alone. For now it seems that the genesis of my increasing PSA remains a mystery.
The plan going forward now is to repeat the PSA in 6 weeks (end Nov) and for this to inform the timing of a further 18F PSMA PET scan in a further attempt at determining what is producing the rising PSA.
Your observations re the potential for my penile implant to be implicated in this unfolding mystery echo my own thoughts on the matter. I'm not quite sure why the person on the Prostate Cancer UK forum flagged it up for me to raise here?
So for now I will certainly keep my eye firmly on the ball with the stumps as well guarded as they can be. As always though, comments and observations are most welcome and highly valued.
The term Consultant Clinical Oncologist is not used here in Australia, albeit that our health care delivery systems model that of the UK. Medical/Radiation Oncology are two distinct medical specialities here in Australia. Given the complexity of training for each speciality I think it unlikely, but not impossible, that Royal College Fellowship credentials would be jointly held. If you care to give me a name of your Prof and Teaching Hospital, I will look up their training and let you know.
Firstly my apologies for assuming that you are US-based. I made the assumption based on the "medical" versus "radiation" oncologist terms you used. I didn't realise that Australia uses these role descriptions too.
I'm happy to provide the details of my Prof however I'm not comfortable publishing them in open forum. I couldn't find an email or email link for you. If you provide me with one (or drop me an email) I'll ping the details straight over.
Yes we do Paul very much based on the UK model seeing as we are still a member of the Commonwealth with the Queen as our Head of State. If you would care to just give me the name of the teaching hospital, that you attend, and I can work it out from there.
You learn something new ever day and you are indeed correct. UK clinical oncology speciality, is indeed a combination of radiation and medical. Five years of post grad training is a pretty heavy load. So you are in very good hands it would seem.