This forum is for the discussion of anything to do with Prostate Cancer. There are only four rules:
No fundraisers, no commercials (although it is OK to recommend choices of treatment or medical people based on your personal research; invitations to participate in third-party surveys are also acceptable, provided there is no compensation to YANA);
No harvesting e-mail addresses for Spam;
No insults or flaming - be polite and respectful at all times and understand that there may be a variety of points of view, all of which may have some validity;
Opinions are OK, but please provide as much factual evidence as possible for any assertions that you are making
Failure to abide by these simple rules will result in the immediate and permanent suspension of your posting privileges.
Since this is an International Forum, please specify your location in your post.
Not much going on here at the forum lately so I am going to add another item. Been seeing more accounts of those having had HIFU as primary treatment for PC. Most seem very pleased with the results stating far less serious side effects and good results. It has also been stated that it has been approved for use in the US now. This all sounds like good news for the victims of this disease though it is a bit late for many of us who suffer the effects of having had the current "gold standard" treatment. As more accurate ways of treating cancerous areas come into practice, these sort of treatments may show a lot of improvement in the treatment of this sadistic disease. Getting more accurate treatment is important in preventing collateral damage but without equally accurate diagnosis, areas of cancer could be missed with this pinpoint accuracy. Getting it all the first time is essential to prevent it from getting away. This reinforces the importance of early and very accurate detection. Getting it early before it can mature is the way to preserve as much good tissue as possible and that is why the results are liked by recipients of HIFU. One thing I wonder though is if this spared good and normal tissue is also prone to develop cancer at a later time. Wouldn't it also have the same DNA fault that the cancerous tissue suffered from? Is this yet another unknown compromise that must be accepted in the battle against this disease? Jon.
I don't think I would trust my life with this procedure but it's nice to hear that some patients are getting good results. If your main priority is to stay alive I personally believe in having a top surgeon cut out the problem. May put a bit of a crimp on your sex life, but really by the time you and your wife hit your 60's sex is not the big deal it was in earlier days. Still wine and golf to enjoy.