This forum is for the discussion of anything to do with Prostate Cancer. There are only four rules:
No fundraisers, no commercials (although it is OK to recommend choices of treatment or medical people based on your personal research; invitations to participate in third-party surveys are also acceptable, provided there is no compensation to YANA);
No harvesting e-mail addresses for Spam;
No insults or flaming - be polite and respectful at all times and understand that there may be a variety of points of view, all of which may have some validity;
Opinions are OK, but please provide as much factual evidence as possible for any assertions that you are making
Failure to abide by these simple rules will result in the immediate and permanent suspension of your posting privileges.
Since this is an International Forum, please specify your location in your post.
The post above certainly looks like another Dorothy Dixer. I hope I am not being to harsh but the same pattern seem's to be repeating yet again. I think from now on, I shall only answer post's that I consider to be genuine. Very sad indeed.
Real questions from me. Very busy travel schedule. Thanks for your feedback.
My urologist wants to do a mapping biopsy prior to beginning active surveillance. The oncologist agreed that this was a good idea. I would prefer to see a few more PSA scores first. My last PSA was 8.7. 12 needles was bad enough. 40-60 sounds barbaric, although I understand many people do this. I am not convinced. Thoughts anyone?
You should consider getting a 3T-MP-MRI. If they find a tumor you can then have a targeted biopsy....fewer cores. I f you get a negative MRI then you can safely monitor with repeat PSA's & MRI's.