Prostate Cancer Survivors

 

YANA - YOU ARE NOT ALONE NOW

PROSTATE CANCER SUPPORT SITE

 

 

This forum is for the discussion of anything to do with Prostate Cancer.
There are only four rules:

  • No fundraisers, no commercials (although it is OK to recommend choices of treatment or medical people based on your personal research; invitations to participate in third-party surveys are also acceptable, provided there is no compensation to YANA);
  • No harvesting e-mail addresses for Spam;
  • No insults or flaming - be polite and respectful at all times and understand that there may be a variety of points of view, all of which may have some validity;
  • Opinions are OK, but please provide as much factual evidence as possible for any assertions that you are making

Failure to abide by these simple rules will result in the immediate and permanent suspension of your posting privileges.

Since this is an International Forum, please specify your location in your post.

General Forum
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: Active Surveillance?

I'd agree with bobbyboy. For men with PC and a serious urinary retention issue a prostatectomy seems like a good idea.

Re: Active Surveillance?

Thanks for opinion. One day I lean towards the Turp/Surveillance, next day I lean towards the removal. I feel like I have been in Prostate Prison for the last 3-5 years. I am ready to be done with this thing despite the side effects. I just want to do the smart/best thing. Thanks again. These opinions and information helps greatly.

RETURN TO HOME PAGE LINKS