This forum is for the discussion of anything to do with Prostate Cancer. There are only four rules:
No fundraisers, no commercials (although it is OK to recommend choices of treatment or medical people based on your personal research; invitations to participate in third-party surveys are also acceptable, provided there is no compensation to YANA);
No harvesting e-mail addresses for Spam;
No insults or flaming - be polite and respectful at all times and understand that there may be a variety of points of view, all of which may have some validity;
Opinions are OK, but please provide as much factual evidence as possible for any assertions that you are making
Failure to abide by these simple rules will result in the immediate and permanent suspension of your posting privileges.
Since this is an International Forum, please specify your location in your post.
Given your youngish age, liquid retention health issues and the fact your doctor feels you'll eventually need to have the prostate removed I would 'personally' skip the Turp and hire the very very best surgeon to get rid of the prostate. The key is to get the best person to remove it to minimize the chance of complications. It's your decision to make but that is what I would do. I had mine removed when I was 58 by the top local specialist and other than now requiring Viagara it was kind of a non event. Perhaps I was just lucky. Who knows. Hope this is helpful.
Thanks for opinion. One day I lean towards the Turp/Surveillance, next day I lean towards the removal. I feel like I have been in Prostate Prison for the last 3-5 years. I am ready to be done with this thing despite the side effects. I just want to do the smart/best thing. Thanks again. These opinions and information helps greatly.
