Prostate Cancer Survivors

 

YANA - YOU ARE NOT ALONE NOW

PROSTATE CANCER SUPPORT SITE

 

 

This forum is for the discussion of anything to do with Prostate Cancer.
There are only four rules:

  • No fundraisers, no commercials (although it is OK to recommend choices of treatment or medical people based on your personal research; invitations to participate in third-party surveys are also acceptable, provided there is no compensation to YANA);
  • No harvesting e-mail addresses for Spam;
  • No insults or flaming - be polite and respectful at all times and understand that there may be a variety of points of view, all of which may have some validity;
  • Opinions are OK, but please provide as much factual evidence as possible for any assertions that you are making

Failure to abide by these simple rules will result in the immediate and permanent suspension of your posting privileges.

Since this is an International Forum, please specify your location in your post.

General Forum
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: PSA vs Gleason Score

My apologies. Indeed tarhoosier is of course correct - it's de-differentiation that's the word that escape frm my ever less lucid mind:-)

Terry in Australia

Re: PSA vs Gleason Score

There is a mathematical formula that relates psa to volume per cc of tumor by gleason grade. The lower the Gleason grade the higher the psa per cc of tumor volume. High grade PC gives off little psa per cc of tumor. It is used to estimate tumor volume if you know the psa and gleason grade. The formula used to be on the PCRI website under PC tools. Dr Bahn also uses this formula so he knows what to look for in terms of size and agressiveness when using CDU.

RETURN TO HOME PAGE LINKS