Prostate Cancer Survivors

 

YANA - YOU ARE NOT ALONE NOW

PROSTATE CANCER SUPPORT SITE

 

 

This forum is for the discussion of anything to do with Prostate Cancer.
There are only four rules:

  • No fundraisers, no commercials (although it is OK to recommend choices of treatment or medical people based on your personal research; invitations to participate in third-party surveys are also acceptable, provided there is no compensation to YANA);
  • No harvesting e-mail addresses for Spam;
  • No insults or flaming - be polite and respectful at all times and understand that there may be a variety of points of view, all of which may have some validity;
  • Opinions are OK, but please provide as much factual evidence as possible for any assertions that you are making

Failure to abide by these simple rules will result in the immediate and permanent suspension of your posting privileges.

Since this is an International Forum, please specify your location in your post.

General Forum
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: Has the definition of Gleason Grades changed/

Dr. Jonathan Oppenheimer's blog post is at http://theprostateblog.blogspot.com/

This is one of those PCa issues that I quite don't know what to think or say about, and I may have a lot of company. If all cancers start with one cell going bad, it's difficult to think that a few abnormal cells are not "cancer" while more of the same kind of cells are.

I've thought for some time that if extensive biopsy only finds Gleason 6 patterns, your "Don't Panic" advise is especially relevant.

I've wondered for some time if anyone who died from prostate cancer only had Gleason 6 patterns. To my mind, it's not cancer if it can't kill you, and should not be referred to as such.

Re: Has the definition of Gleason Grades changed/

Steve,
From what I have read about 3% of Gleason 6 are very agressive for unknown reasons. These progress fairly fast in 3 to 6 months when most G6 progress very slowly.
JohnT

RETURN TO HOME PAGE LINKS