This forum is for the discussion of anything to do with Prostate Cancer. There are only four rules:
No fundraisers, no commercials (although it is OK to recommend choices of treatment or medical people based on your personal research; invitations to participate in third-party surveys are also acceptable, provided there is no compensation to YANA);
No harvesting e-mail addresses for Spam;
No insults or flaming - be polite and respectful at all times and understand that there may be a variety of points of view, all of which may have some validity;
Opinions are OK, but please provide as much factual evidence as possible for any assertions that you are making
Failure to abide by these simple rules will result in the immediate and permanent suspension of your posting privileges.
Since this is an International Forum, please specify your location in your post.
1. Terry, you use to have a link somewhere in this site for donations, was it removed or am I missing it.
2. I always follow Greg Nackers story. He is 12 years into it, and right after surgery his PSA averaged between .6 and .7, never getting close to zero. What a story from the point of view that he did not let doctors push him around with the .2 bio-chemical failure requiring more treatments. Tweleve years later his PSA is around 1.2 and steady. I guess the key words here is raising but steady. At the rate he is going, by the time his PSA reaches 5.0, he will be 105 years old. Go Greg.
