This forum is for the discussion of anything to do with Prostate Cancer. There are only four rules:
No fundraisers, no commercials (although it is OK to recommend choices of treatment or medical people based on your personal research; invitations to participate in third-party surveys are also acceptable, provided there is no compensation to YANA);
No harvesting e-mail addresses for Spam;
No insults or flaming - be polite and respectful at all times and understand that there may be a variety of points of view, all of which may have some validity;
Opinions are OK, but please provide as much factual evidence as possible for any assertions that you are making
Failure to abide by these simple rules will result in the immediate and permanent suspension of your posting privileges.
Since this is an International Forum, please specify your location in your post.
Re: Re: Nerve repair/regeneration following surgery
Thank you Terry for the information. I have joined the site mentioned and did look through the other site for relevant clinical trials. I did speak to an associate professor who is interested in this area and is looking into 'nerve regeneration' in general and assured me she would contact me if she heard of anything happening in this area around the world. She is based at Royal North Shore Hospital. I feel like we have not moved ahead that much when it comes to the treatment of Erectile Dysfunction and I feel that this is a very important issue that needs to be addressed. I could be wrong, but I feel that not enough people are speaking out about this issue and I understand that it is a very private issue and perhaps not one easily discussed by those affected. I did notice that studies are being undertaken, like you discovered, overseas and I have written to several Universities, no responses as yet unfortunately. Will keep you posted.
Re: Re: Re: Nerve repair/regeneration following surgery
Molly,
I agree with you when you say “I could be wrong, but I feel that not enough people are speaking out about this issue and I understand that it is a very private issue and perhaps not one easily discussed by those affected.” although the relative anonymity of the Internet has helped to ease the discussions.
But I also believe that one of the biggest issues is the “divide and conquer” problem that arises from so many members of the medical profession implying that men who are concerned about erectile dysfunction are in a minority. Combined with the throwaway line ”Dead men don’t have erections” men feel that they have just been unlucky in the side effects while being fortunate that their tumour was discovered early and that they have been ‘saved’.
Although I accept that many of the men who do discuss their erectile issues may not be representative of all the men who have had treatment (on the basis that the men who have no problems may not get involved in any discussion) I still am inclined to the view that there are significantly more men with severe problems than are shown in published studies. Those show the results from centres where a very high number of procedures are carried out by teams that are likely to include the very best surgeons and radiologists. But these teams of excellence cannot treat all the men who choose to have treatment – and they are left to the less skilled, less experienced operators who almost certainly cannot claim the morbidity rates of the teams of excellence.
And of course, it is not only the question of erectile dysfunction that is at issue. Whilst most men are aware of the danger of losing the ability of retaining their erectile ability, very few are aware of the issue of leakage of urine following surgery or the increased risk of Peyronie’s disease, where the penis becomes bent when erected. Yet these, and other, side effects are real, and they occur more frequently than they are reported.
