This forum is for the discussion of anything to do with Prostate Cancer. There are only four rules:
No fundraisers, no commercials (although it is OK to recommend choices of treatment or medical people based on your personal research; invitations to participate in third-party surveys are also acceptable, provided there is no compensation to YANA);
No harvesting e-mail addresses for Spam;
No insults or flaming - be polite and respectful at all times and understand that there may be a variety of points of view, all of which may have some validity;
Opinions are OK, but please provide as much factual evidence as possible for any assertions that you are making
Failure to abide by these simple rules will result in the immediate and permanent suspension of your posting privileges.
Since this is an International Forum, please specify your location in your post.
I'm sure your urologist knows what she is talking about regarding the types of cancer, but it sounds like your biopsy was a horror story. In short, most of us have felt some of your pain.
To tell you not to worry until the pathology report comes in would be stupid. Of course you will worry about the results. At this point in your early journey, I would suggest one thing. Try not to dream up scenarios and problems before they occur. Either you do or do not have prostate cancer. Hoorah if you don't. You will deal with it if you do. When my initial pathology reports came in from the lab, they had me at a Stage T-1C (early) and Gleason 7 (4+3) which would indicate that a more aggressive cancer was dominate in my prostate. After they took my prostate out with robotic surgery, they found the cancer was actually a Gleason 7, but it was a 3+4 which means a less agressive cancer was the predominate cancer. I still needed treatment, but it goes to show that the results of the biopsies need to be checked and re-checked. I also had a prostacint test using redioactive isotopes merged with a cat-scan. The results of that test were dead wrong when reviewed against the final prostate, vesicles and tissue matter that were taken on May 16.
You may not need any advice right now, but get a urologist that knows what he is going and doesn't hurt you. Don't be afraid to take charge of your care and decisions. It's your body and you need to make the best decisions for you. Think of doctors as consultants and mechanics. The surgeon will push surgery, the radiologist will push seeds or some other radioactive treatment. They all have their agendas.
Try to relax this week and think about positive things. One day at a time. If the results come back showing you have cancer, get ready to ask a zillion questions of your doctor, the doctor that performed the lab test, and other doctors. I saw my urologist twice. Once to perform the biopsy, the other to give me the results. The rest of the time I spent with prospective surgeons and radiologist interviewing them. I kept my general physician and urologist informed by having the other physician's tests sent to them.
Good luck. I hope your test is negative (which is positive) and that you don't have cancer.
Satistically your chances of having an infection are much higher than having cancer. With that said also consider trhat your promise to your Dad may save your life. My son is now 43 and had his first PSA test at 41 summer 2005 the date of my diagnosis. Fortunately his so far is negative. Knowing that there may be a concern is the first step toward stopping the progress and most likely stopping the spread beyond the gland.
One of the most important steps for you is to take command of your treatment. We have been trained to "leaving the driving to the Docs." If you are not entirely confortable with the diagnosis and/or the process get another opionion. Demand written information of everything - biopsy result etc so that you can share the findings with another physcian for interpretation. The reading of biopsy test does not always come out the same. Gather all the information you can and then and only then make your own decisions. Best of luck
The urologist should have offered a local anesthetic. When I was biopsied in 1997 this was uncommon, but it is very common now.
Your urologist was correct as far as PCa cancer. Dr. Oppenheimer, a leading pathologist who specializes in PCa describes the cancer as often being "diffuse" and spread throuhgout the tissues rather than in a nodule or tumor.
Although a positive biopsy means you have cancer, a negative biopsy does not rule it out. Biopsies often miss cancer since very small samples are taken. Arnold Palmer had (I believe) 15 biopsies before his was found.
Due to the importance of the Gleason score in the decision process AND the fact that prostate cancer is frequently understaged by “general purpose” pathologists who look at a lot of different tissue, If your biopsy shows cancer, I suggest that you obtain a second opinion on your biopsy slides from a pathologist that specializes in PCa. Here is my list of some of the better pathologists:
9351 W. Broad Street
Richmond, VA 23294
Electronic mail: email@example.com
Stanford University Medical Center, Dept. of Urology
Room S-287, Stanford CA 94305
Oppenheimer Urologic Reference Lab (OURLAB)
1854 Air Lane Drive; Suite 17A; Nashville TN 37210
Telephone: 615-847-0410 or 1-888-8OURLAB
Electronic mail: Dr Oppenheimer: firstname.lastname@example.org
General Information: email@example.com
If cancer is not found from this biopsy, continue to monitor your PSA, and if it keeps increasing, have another. Some doctors are better at finding cancer than others, Dr. Fred Lee being among the best.
How do we approach a second opinion from the paths? I need to know the routine. How to go about this. Also, why could we not ask the uro for a xanax or valuim for the night before and perhaps before the biopsy? Why not ask for pain medication afterwards?Thanks!