This discussion on the ethics of using academic writing services is crucial. My view is that ethics depend on how such services are used.

If a service writes a paper for submission, that's unethical. However, for an academic editing service like Academic Editors, the ethics are different. Their role isn't to write, but to refine and polish existing work. They help ensure original ideas are communicated effectively, free from errors or unclear phrasing. This supports academic integrity by empowering authors to present their authentic voice and research professionally, enhancing communication rather than circumventing learning.

That’s a really thoughtful question. I think the key is in how the material is used. If someone uses academic writing services just to copy and submit the work, that crosses an ethical line. But if it’s used the way tools like Paw Tenant support ESA letter needs—by helping people understand their rights and responsibilities—then it’s more about guidance and learning. It’s similar here: if students use these services as examples or to clarify complex topics, they’re just finding another way to strengthen their understanding.