As Tim had to go to cricket as soon as the game finished, I didn't get the chance to ask him for his marks out of 10, so I had to make a guess myself for the match report even though I wasn't really watching after I came off injured.
The ones I am particularly unsure about are Steve Cokell, Del and Tem.
As Terry said he thought I was a 6.5 (instead of my usual 5.5 !), then Steve, Del & Tem are presumably at least half a mark higher than me, which was why I gave them all 7...but were they better than that ?
I kept hearing Steve say 'Oh sh!t' during the Second Half whenever he played a pass out of defence, Del didn't seem as sharp as normal, and it looked like Tem was struggling with an injury (or had blisters ?).
They still played well though, but I thought Terry, Barney, Danny Hagan, Daniel Daley and Leon (in particular) were quality, and Martin Loveday looked good in goal as well.
Can I have a sensible general consensus of opinion on the marks please ?
