Prostate Cancer Survivors

 

YANA - YOU ARE NOT ALONE NOW

PROSTATE CANCER SUPPORT SITE

 

 

  

This forum is for the discussion of anything to do with Prostate Cancer.

There are only  two rules: no commercials (although it is quite OK to recommend treatment choices and medical people based on your personal research) or fundraisers and no flaming - be polite at all times.

Since we are aiming for it to be a true International Forum it would be good if you showed your country in your post.



Return to Website

  Reply
  Forum

Subject:   Re: Explanation for nondecrease in PSA despite prostatectomy?
Name:   Ted Coxhead
Date Posted:   Nov 4, 07 - 10:47 AM
Email:   tedcoxhead@yahoo.co.uk
Message:   Thank you very much for your detective work, Terry. The point Dr K makes about residual inflammation rings a lot of bells in my case.

In an earlier post you said that we learn something new about this disease every day. Today I learnt that the PS part of PSA may not be as PS as we had all thought!!
Replies:    
Re: Re: Explanation for nondecrease in PSA despite prostatectomy? by Ralph Schneider · Nov 16, 07 - 4:24 AM
Re: Explanation for nondecrease in PSA despite prostatectomy? by Ted Coxhead · Nov 16, 07 - 10:27 PM
Re: Explanation for nondecrease in PSA despite prostatectomy? by Terry Herbert · Nov 17, 07 - 7:15 AM
Re: Explanation for nondecrease in PSA despite prostatectomy? by Terry Herbert · Dec 5, 07 - 4:46 AM
Re: Explanation for nondecrease in PSA despite prostatectomy? by Ted Coxhead · Feb 29, 08 - 10:04 AM


  Reply
  Forum




RETURN TO HOME PAGE LINKS